- National Fuel Gas Company v. National Fuel Marketing. Obtained a settlement for client National Fuel Gas Company in a trademark infringement case concerning the NATIONAL FUEL trademark. (M.D. Penn)
- In the Matter of Certain Agricultural Machines and Components Thereof, No. 337-TA-487. Obtained general exclusion order and cease and desist orders for Deere & Company in matter involving "gray market" and other imported goods infringing Deere's famous green and yellow trademarks and JOHN DEERE trademark.
- Radlo Foods, LLC v. Born Free, Inc. (D. Del.). Represented owner of BORN FREE trademark.
- General Conference Corporation of Seventh Day Adventists v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services and National Institutes of Health (D. D.C. ). Represented trademark owner against alleged infringer.
- Waterford Wedgewood PLC v. Forma-Kutzscher Gmbh, Opposition No. 123,735 (). Represented Waterford against infringement of its leading LISMORE brand for crystal.
- Mueller Sports Medicine, Inc. v. Beveridge Marketing LLC, No. 04-C-648-C, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8937 (W.D. Wisc. 2005). Represented defendant accused of infringing patent for under eye light absorbing devices worn by athlete and trademarks, obtained summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of the client.
- Bush Brothers & Co., Inc. v. Nash Finch Co., No. 02-1621-SLR (D. Del. ). Protection of famous trade dress of Bush's beans.
- Gus Sclafani Corp. v. Violet Packing Co., Cancellation Nos. 25,837 and 27,434; Opposition No.106,710, 2002 TTAB Lexis 107 (TTAB ), aff'd 2003 U.S. App. Lexis 1103, Fed.Cir. 2003. Obtained favorable ruling from the TTAB concerning client's priority of use.
- Deere & Co. v. MTD Products, Inc., No. 00-CV-596 (LMM), 2001 U.S. Dist. Lexis 5190, S.D.N.Y. 2000. Represented Deere & Co. in a matter protecting Deere's famous green and yellow trade dress.
- RP Technical Services, Inc. v. Severe Paintball, L.C., No. 01-7624-CIV, S.D. Fla. 2001. Prevented injunction against client's trade dress for paintballs.
- Advance Stores Co. v. Refinishing Specialties,188 F.3d 408 (6th Cir. ). Preserved on appeal a permanent injunction restricting a prior trademark user's use of a conflicting mark to a single county.
We follow industry news and trends so you can stay ahead of the game. Subscribe to receive emails regarding policies and findings that impact you and your business.
Already a subscriber and want to update your preferences? Click here.